In nature, the strong survive and those best suited to survival will out-live the weak.
They will admit to an obvious parallel between Darwin's theory of Natural Selection and Spencer's beliefs. Scientists and evolutionists maintain that this interpretation is only loosely based on Darwin's theory of natural selection. Even without such actions, Social Darwinism has proven to be a false and dangerous philosophy. Various other dictators and criminals have claimed the cause of Social Darwinism in carrying out their acts. Many philosophers noted evolutionary echoes in Hitler's march to exterminate an entire race of people. The Nazis claimed that the murder of Jews in World War II was an example of cleaning out the inferior genetics. Those who reject any and all forms of charity or governmental welfare often use arguments rooted in Social Darwinism.Īt its worst, the implications of Social Darwinism were used as scientific justification for the Holocaust. Some even extended this philosophy into a micro-economic issue, claiming that social welfare programs that helped the poor and disadvantaged were contrary to nature itself. Looking at this apparent advantage, as well as the economic and military structures, some argued that natural selection was playing out, and that the race more suited to survival was winning.
This theory was used to promote the idea that the white European race was superior to others, and therefore, destined to rule over them.Īt the time that Spencer began to promote Social Darwinism, the technology, economy, and government of the "White European" was advanced in comparison to that of other cultures. In its simplest form, Social Darwinism follows the mantra of "the strong survive," including human issues. Social Darwinism is an application of the theory of natural selection to social, political, and economic issues. Herbert Spencer, a 19th century philosopher, promoted the idea of Social Darwinism. What is Social Darwinism QUESTION: What is Social Darwinism?
0 kommentar(er)
